According to Baz, conservation of archaeological sites does not really make much sense, but - in his opinion - is a form of '
Knowledge loss… by neglect', posted on September 3, 2019 by "John Howland"
I recently stumbled across a bizarre idea [...]
“…it is better to leave objects and other evidence in the ground where it has been lying safely for hundreds or thousands of years. Here it remains safe for future generations to investigate with better techniques and with better-informed questions to ask.”
Whoever dreamt up such idiocy obviously didn’t think it through to its logical conclusion. [...] Well, arkies and arkiedom, that’s fine…so don’t dig, be happy, but don’t try and palm this lunacy off on detectorists as ‘best practice.’ [...] [we, who] want no truck with the insanity of abandoning artefacts to the tender mercies of chemical deterioration, will rightly cast it aside as poor heritage practice and continue to bring fabulous historical items into the light of day for study and evaluation.
Also, never let it be said it’s unethical to sell, or profit from any object found [...] What is unethical, is leaving artefacts in the ground [...]
The utter lunacy of leaving valuable and notionally historical objects in the ground not only robs the heritage but seriously short-changes the public.
It amounts to knowledge loss by neglect.
No comments:
Post a Comment